8/13/2023 0 Comments Dxo deep prime vs topaz denoise![]() Because I missed the selective processing options that Capture NX2 lost due to the license issue with Nik Software I decided to check out Capture One. Any thrid party software I know up to now ignores parts of the RAW file informartion, like in-camera settings, AF point or such alike. I have used purely Nikon software in the past because of their superior way they interprete the NEF files. Lets see what's the percentage of pictures processed with which program after a period of time. Of course the preferences of all of you out there are something very personal, but for people that just want to be able to do the necessary, straight forward processing of photos, PL4 is a good way to go and although I have already spent the money for the Capture One license, I am almost sure I will change over to PL4.Īfter the programs can access the same NEFs in parallel because they all handle the adjustments in sidecar files, there is nothing lost. Seeing nothing but my drives and directories in the browser after installing the test version was a big relief to me The revival of U-point is great - not only for the old school Capture NX2 fans out there - and from my perspective a breeze to use I currently haven't got the time to go into detail (may be I can do that later and topic-related depending on the discussion here), but comparing Capture NX-D, Capture One and PhotoLab4 as programs that are working non-destrucively and directly from native NEF files, I can say that in terms of denoising PL4 is the clear winner ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |